Author: research editorial

Twitter has banned several prominent journalists for covering Elon Musk’s Twitter antics

On Thursday evening, Twitter banned a number of prominent journalists who were covering Elon Musk and his various businesses from the platform. The platform appears to have done so without warning or explanation.

Normally, before an account is banned, Twitter will send a few notifications or warnings, informing users of the policies they have violated, unless they have broken local laws. However, since Musk took over, Twitter has been banning specific accounts with no prior notice. Welcome to Elon Musk’s interpretation of free speech.

The journalists were barred after Twitter suspended the Twitter account of Mastodon, the open-source social media alternative that exploded in popularity following Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter. Twitter took action against Mastodon after the account linked to the Mastodon page of @ElonJet, a student-created bot that tracks Musk’s private jet’s location.

A few of the suspended journalists and accounts had shared screenshots and articles about Mastodon’s suspension. Drew Harwell, a Washington Post reporter, tweeted about Mastodon being kicked off the platform shortly before his suspension.

Former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann, The New York Times’ Ryan Mac, CNN’s Donie O’Sullivan, Mashable’s Matt Binder, and journalist Aaron Rupar are among the accounts that have been banned. All of the aforementioned names covered Musk on a regular basis and wrote extensively about Musk and his takeover of Twitter.

Rupar commented on his Substack suspension, noting that while he did not know why his account was suspended, he did share a link to ElonJet’s Facebook account while reporting on the subject. Mac shared the message he received from Twitter on an alternate account, noting that there was no warning before the permanent suspension.

Some of the suspended accounts shared the Twitter handles of Mastodon and ElonJet, as well as screenshots of the tweet that appears to have gotten the former account suspended.

Because Twitter’s human moderation teams have been reduced, automated systems enforcing Twitter’s new rules against accounts like @ElonJet were overzealous in this case. However, it’s just as likely that Musk is directing the moderation process.

Musk took to Twitter to explain his reasoning for the ban. He stated that the bans were deliberate, and that the same doxxing rules apply to “journalists” as they do to everyone else.

Musk stated that the suspensions would only be in effect for seven days. He later tweeted a poll asking his Twitter followers to vote on the fate of the banned journalists, who had previously been notified that their accounts had been suspended “permanently.” It should be noted that the journalists who were barred received no such notice.

Furthermore, it is standard practise at Twitter to notify users about posts and skim them to remove offensive or potentially harmful posts before they are banned. Furthermore, the policy that these accounts violated, which prohibited users from sharing “live location information,” is only 24 hours old, so they couldn’t have been notified and given enough time to act on it.

You May Be Also Interested in:

Follow us for more updates on Twitter, Tumblr, LinkedIn

Henry Cavill confirms he is no longer Superman: ‘This isn’t the best news, but that’s life…’

Hollywood star Henry Cavill has announced that he will not reprise his role as Superman. This was confirmed by the man himself after James Gunn and Peter Safran revealed that their upcoming DCEU slate includes a young Superman film that will follow the character in his early days as a cub reporter.

Henry took to Instagram to share the following message: “I just met with James Gunn and Peter Safran, and I have some bad news for you. After all, I won’t be returning as Superman. After being told by the studio to announce my return in October, prior to their hiring, this isn’t the easiest news to deliver, but that’s life. The changing of the guard is a common occurrence. That is something I respect. James and Peter are creating a universe. I wish them and everyone else involved with the new universe the best of luck and fortune.”

Dwayne Johnson reveals that Warner Bros. did not want Henry Cavill to return as Superman (Dailymotion)

“For those who have stood by my side over the years, we can mourn for a moment, but then we must remember…Superman is still alive and well. Everything he stands for is still there, as are the examples he sets for us! My turn to don the cape has come a

nd gone, but what Superman stands for will never change. Onwards and upwards, it’s been a pleasure riding with you all “he concluded.

Onwards and upwards, it’s been a pleasure riding with you all “he concluded.

Cavill announced his return as the cape-wearing, flying superhuman back in October, much to the delight of his fans.

Henry Cavill has played Superman in a number of DC films, including Man of Steel and Batman vs. Superman.

It had previously been reported that Cavill’s future as Superman was not as secure as it appeared when he announced his return. Certainly, Cavill confirms that there were plans for a Man of Steel sequel at the time of the announcement that he would return. However, once Gunn and Safran were hired, those plans changed.

This appears to confirm other reports that the entire Snyderverse may be scrapped, as Wonder Woman 3 appears to be on hold. Patty Jenkins, the director, confirmed this on her Twitter account.

You May Be Also Interested in:

Follow us for more updates on Twitter, Tumblr, LinkedIn

“After all, I won’t be returning as Superman. After being told by the studio to announce my return in October, prior to their hiring, this isn’t the easiest news to deliver, but that’s life “The actor penned.

In late October, Warner Bros. hired Guardians of the Galaxy director James Gunn and veteran executive Peter Safran as co-chairmen and CEOs of the newly formed DC Studios. Since then, there have been reports that the entire Zack Snyder-created DC Universe, including Wonder Woman, could be scrapped.

WTO ruled that Trump’s metal tariffs violated global rules

The World Trade Organization ruled on Friday that US tariffs on steel and aluminium imports imposed by then-President Donald Trump violated global trade rules, in a decision that was immediately criticised by Washington.

The three-person adjudicating panel said the US measures were inconsistent with WTO rules and recommended that the US bring them into compliance in one of the most high-profile and potentially explosive cases to come before the WTO.

The US said it strongly disagreed with the panel’s “flawed” interpretation and conclusions.

It could challenge the ruling, but that would leave it in a legal limbo because Washington has blocked appointments to the WTO Appellate Body, rendering it unable to render a decision.

China expressed hope that the US would follow the panel’s decision and “correct its wrongful conduct as soon as possible.”

The US Trade Representative’s office stated in a statement that the US would not “stand idly by” as Chinese overcapacity threatened its steel and aluminium sectors, as well as its national security.

The US steel industry also blasted the WTO panel, with the Steel Manufacturers Association stating that it supported the government’s refusal to accept its findings.

“As a result of these disputes, we do not intend to remove Section 232 duties,” it said, adding that the panel report reinforced the need for WTO reform.

The US steel industry also blasted the WTO panel, with the Steel Manufacturers Association stating that it supported the government’s refusal to accept its findings.

In 2018, Trump imposed 25% tariffs on steel imports and 10% tariffs on aluminium imports, citing Section 232 of the 1962 Tariff Act, which allows the president to restrict imports if they threaten national security. Later, free trade partners Canada and Mexico were exempted.

The tariffs prompted several WTO members, including China, to challenge the measure, and a three-member WTO panel issued its findings in cases brought by China, Norway, Switzerland, and Turkey on Friday. Indian and Russian cases are still pending.

Last year, Washington agreed to remove tariffs on EU imports, prompting Brussels to halt the EU case.

Otherwise, President Joe Biden’s administration has maintained the metals tariffs that were a centrepiece of Trump’s America First strategy.

The case hinged on the WTO’s exemption from global trade rules in cases of national security.

The central US argument was that national security should be judged by countries themselves, not by three WTO adjudicators sitting in Geneva.

Complainant Switzerland stated that the ruling did not call into question WTO members’ right to take broad discretionary security measures, but they did have to meet certain minimum requirements that could be scrutinised at the WTO.

You May Be Also Interested in:

The central US argument was that national security is a matter for countries to decide, not three WTO adjudicators sitting in Geneva.

Complainant Switzerland stated that the decision did not call into question WTO members’ right to take broad discretionary security measures, but they did have to meet certain minimum requirements that could be scrutinised at the WTO.

Follow us for more updates on Twitter, Tumblr, LinkedIn

GSK, Pfizer, and Sanofi have been granted relief after a court ruled that claims of Zantac-linked cancer were not “supported by science.”

GSK Plc, Pfizer Inc, Sanofi SA, and Boehringer Ingelheim were released from thousands of U.S. lawsuits alleging that the heartburn medication Zantac caused cancer on Tuesday after a judge ruled that the claims were not supported by sound science.

According to a report by US District Judge Robin Rosenberg in West Palm Beach, Florida, the ruling dismisses approximately 50,000 claims in federal court.

However, it has no bearing on the tens of thousands of similar cases currently pending in state courts across the country.

“We are extremely surprised by this miscarriage of justice,” said the plaintiffs’ lawyers in a joint statement, and “fully expect” the ruling to be reversed on appeal.

According to a Sanofi spokesperson, the decision “significantly reduces the scope of the litigation potentially by more than 50%,” with the remaining litigation taking place only in state court. Furthermore, a spokesperson for GSK stated that the company welcomed the decision, and Pfizer stated that it was pleased with the outcome.

According to a Sanofi spokesperson, the decision “significantly reduces the scope of the litigation potentially by more than 50%,” with the remaining litigation taking place only in state court.

In a statement, privately held German drugmaker Boehringer said it was looking forward to “continuing our vigorous defence of the remaining cases in state courts.”

According to Reuters, all of the drug companies have denied that Zantac causes cancer.

Zantac, which was approved in 1983, became the world’s best-selling medicine in 1988 and one of the first drugs to sell for more than $1 billion per year. Initially marketed by a predecessor of GSK, it was later sold to Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and finally Sanofi. Numerous generic drugmakers also released versions of the medication, but none are named as defendants in federal court cases.

Some manufacturers and pharmacies stopped selling the drug in 2019 due to concerns that its active ingredient, ranitidine, degraded over time to form a chemical known as NDMA. While NDMA is found in trace amounts in food and water, it is known to cause cancer in higher concentrations.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration removed all remaining brand names Zantac and generic versions from the market in 2020, citing research indicating that the amount of NDMA in the products increases with storage time and could potentially become unsafe.

According to reports, lawsuits from people who claimed to have developed cancer after taking Zantac began to pile up soon after the recalls began. Plaintiffs claimed that the companies were aware, or should have been aware, that ranitidine posed a cancer risk and failed to warn consumers.

The lawsuit initially included claims of over ten different types of cancer allegedly linked to the medication, but it was later reduced to five: bladder, esophageal, gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic cancer. Some claims involving other cancers are still being heard in state courts.

You May Be Also Interested in:

Follow us for more updates on Twitter, Tumblr, LinkedIn

Covid-19 was a ‘man-made’ virus: According to a scientist who worked at the Wuhan lab

According to The New York Post, a US-based scientist who worked at a research lab in China’s Wuhan revealed Monday that Covid-19 was a “man-made virus” that had leaked from the facility.

Andrew Huff, who previously worked for the EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based non-profit dedicated to the study of infectious diseases, stated that the coronavirus had leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China more than two years ago. He also accused authorities of the “worst US intelligence failure since 9/11.”

Andrew Huff, who previously worked for the EcoHealth Alliance, a New York-based non-profit dedicated to the study of infectious diseases, stated that the coronavirus had leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China more than two years ago. He also accused authorities of the “worst US intelligence failure since 9/11.”

Huff claims in his new book, The Truth About Wuhan, that the US government funded coronaviruses in China. With no biosafety safeguards in place, China’s gain-of-function experiments — which are used to genetically alter organisms in order to improve their biological functions — resulted in a leak at the Wuhan lab.

According to The Sun, epidemiologist Huff revealed in his book that “foreign laboratories did not have adequate control measures in place to ensure proper biosafety, biosecurity, and risk management, ultimately resulting in the lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

EcoHealth Alliance has been studying coronaviruses in bats for over a decade, with funding from the National Institutes of Health, and has formed close ties with the Wuhan lab. Huff worked for the non-profit from 2014 to 2016, rising to the position of vice president in 2015.

“China knew this was a genetically engineered agent from the start,” Huff wrote. “I was terrified by what I saw,” Huff, a Michigan Army veteran, told The Sun Online. “All we were doing was handing them bioweapon technology.”

Over the last two years, the Wuhan lab has been at the centre of global debates about the origins of the coronavirus. The Chinese government and Wuhan lab officials have repeatedly denied the allegations, labelling the theory that the virus originated in China’s lab facility “baseless.” However, top researchers have continued to investigate the virus’s origins.

In February 2022, a World Health Organization (WHO) expert group sent two letters to senior Chinese government officials requesting information about the first human cases of COVID-19 in the city of Wuhan. The experts at WHO asserted that numerous studies in this field of research should be conducted “with the staff in the laboratories tasked with managing and implementing biosafety and biosecurity,” which would then lead to revelations about how viruses related to COVID-19 were managed.

You May Be Also Interested in:

Follow us for more updates on Twitter, Tumblr, LinkedIn

The G20 presidency of India will be a “watershed moment” in its history: Ambassador Ruchira Kamboj

On Thursday, India took over the monthly rotating presidency of the 15-nation United Nations Security Council, as well as the year-long presidency of the G20.

According to India’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Ambassador Ruchira Kamboj, the country’s presidency of the G20 will be a “watershed moment” in its history as the country seeks to play an important role in finding pragmatic global solutions for the well-being of all.

On Thursday, India took over the monthly rotating presidency of the 15-nation United Nations Security Council, as well as the year-long presidency of the G20.

Kamboj said on Thursday India sees both the presidencies – that of the Security Council for this month and the G20 for the next year, as a “new responsibility”.

“We will do everything in our power to demonstrate that the global community’s hopes and expectations are met,” said the President of the Security Council for December.

Regarding India’s G20 presidency, Kamboj stated that it is an honour for the country to lead a group that represents 85% of the world’s GDP and 75% of global trade.

According to Kamboj, India’s presidency of the G20 comes at a time when the world is in crisis and chaos, as Prime Minister Narendra Modi has noted.

“The world is dealing with the aftermath of a disruptive, once-in-a-century pandemic, as well as conflicts and significant economic uncertainty. At this time, the world looks to the G20 with bated breath “She briefed reporters at the UN headquarters in New York on the month’s agenda and India’s priorities as the Council’s president this month.

Kamboj stressed that India’s presidency would be a “watershed moment in her history,” as it seeks to play an important role in finding pragmatic global solutions for the well-being of all, and in doing so, to manifest the true spirit of the world as one large family, which is deeply embedded in Indian culture.

She went on to say that as G20 President, India will set the agenda for the year, identify themes and focus areas, hold meetings, and deliver outcome documents.

According to Kamboj, the G20 presidency will be “ambitious, decisive, and all-inclusive,” guided by the philosophy “One Earth, One Family, One Future.”

In response to a question, Kamboj stated that the effort during India’s G20 presidency “will be to maintain unity because India truly believes that the world is one big family.”

“To that end, we bring people-centered solutions to the table, and we will continue to do so throughout the presidency,” she said.

She stated that many successes have occurred in India in recent years, and the country hopes to replicate some of these successes, scale them up, bring them to the world, and share its experiences, “underpinned by the philosophy that the world is one family.”

The G20 summit will take place in New Delhi in September of next year, with more than 100 pre-meetings taking place “across the length and breadth of our country – from Kashmir to Kanyakumari,” according to Kamboj.

In response to a question about protests in China over its COVID-19 policies and a Pentagon report on China’s nuclear arsenal expansion, Kamboj stated that India does not “comment on the internal and domestic affairs of other countries.” “We have no comment on that,” she said.

She stated that whether it is the pandemic or other crises, India will face challenges during its presidency and tenure, and that it views all of these challenges as opportunities.

World Powers Extend Support as India Takes Over the G20 Presidency

World Powers Extend Support as India Takes Over the G20 Presidency

You May Be Also Interested in:

Follow us for more updates on Twitter, Tumblr, LinkedIn

World Powers Extend Support as India Takes Over the G20 Presidency

Several world powers expressed their congratulations and support for India’s historic assumption of the G20 presidency in 2023.

On the historic occasion of India taking over the G20 presidency in 2023, several world powers, including the United States, Germany, and France, extended their congratulations and support to the country. On Thursday, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre stated that the US stands fully behind India as it takes over the presidency of the forum.

“We look forward to supporting India’s G-20 presidency next year and on a variety of issues, including addressing current food and energy security challenges while continuing to build a resilient global economy,” she said. Australia has also joined the list of countries congratulating India on the start of its G20 presidency, with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese wishing his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi well.

“Wishing @narendramodi every success as India assumes the G20 presidency,” Albanese tweeted. Australia’s High Commissioner to India, Barry O’Farrell, stated that Canberra is eager to work with New Delhi to achieve G20 goals.

‘A Momentous Occasion’: World Powers Extend Support As India Assumes G20 Presidency

“Today marks a watershed moment for #India as it assumes the #G20Presidency.” We look forward to collaborating closely with @amitabhk87 and the @g20org team to achieve our common goals and make progress on the theme “One Earth, One Family, One Future.” He wrote, “#G20India @G20Australia #G20.”

Singapore High Commissioner Simon Wong made a video to congratulate India on the occasion. “We look forward to working closely with @amitabhk87 @harshvshringla and team to make India’s Presidency a resounding success!” he tweeted.

Germany and France congratulate India on assuming the G20 presidency.

Germany and France were also quick to send their congratulations, with German Ambassador Philipp Ackermann stating that India will play an important role on the global stage as it assumes the G20 presidency. “We believe that India is now a major player on the international stage.” India’s G20 presidency will be a critical factor in restoring global order. “We have high expectations for Delhi, and we hope that Prime Minister Modi’s government will have a positive influence in the next 12 months,” he told reporters, according to PTI.

Germany and France congratulate India on assuming the G20 presidency

Furthermore, in a tweet, French Ambassador to India Emmanuel Lenain stated that France is pleased to see India in the “driver’s seat” as global powers attempt to unite the world. “Today, India assumes the G20 presidency for a year, as well as the UN Security Council chairship for December.” We are pleased to see India in the driver’s seat as we work to keep the world united in the face of unprecedented challenges. “India has the full support of France,” the envoy wrote.

You May Be Also Interested in:

Follow us for more updates on Twitter, Tumblr, LinkedIn

Elon Musk says that Twitter Blue will relaunch in December with gold, grey, and blue checkmarks

Elon Musk has announced that Twitter will ‘tentatively’ relaunch its ‘Blue Tick’ enabling Twitter Blue service on Friday, December 2, 2022, after indefinitely suspending it.

The updated service will include distinct checkmarks for various entities.

“We apologise for the delay; we hope to launch Verified on Friday next week,” Elon said in a tweet.

“We apologise for the delay; we hope to launch Verified on Friday next week,” Elon said in a tweet. “Gold check for companies, grey check for government, blue check for individuals (celebrity or not), and all verified accounts will be manually authenticated before the check activates,” he added.

Musk described the transition as “painful but necessary.”

Musk was chastised earlier this month for allowing companies, individuals, and other entities to be impersonated on Twitter by bogus accounts. Elon Musk has set an $8 subscription fee for Twitter Blue, and according to a recent tweet, the price will remain $8 when the service relaunches in December.

Elon had previously stated that Twitter Blue would be delayed “until there is high confidence in stopping impersonation.” Many bogus verified accounts used Twitter Blue to become verified and impersonate well-known companies and individuals in order to commit fraud.

One user, impersonating the pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly, tweeted that the company will provide free insulin to its customers, causing the company’s stock to fall 5% in morning trading on Friday.

Several bogus verified Twitter Blue accounts disrupted Twitter. One user, impersonating the pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly, tweeted that the company will provide free insulin to its customers, causing the company’s stock to fall 5% in morning trading on Friday.

A fake Nintendo account later posted an image of Mario giving the middle finger.

You May Be Also Interested in:

Follow us for more updates on Twitter, Tumblr, LinkedIn

As Twitter struggles to deal with hate speech, Musk says he will grant ‘amnesty’ to banned accounts

Elon Musk, the owner of Twitter, has taken another step toward dismantling the social media platform’s anti-hate speech mechanisms.

Musk announced on Thursday that he would grant “amnesty” to all suspended Twitter accounts that have not violated the law or “engaged in egregious spam.” Musk made the decision after a poll on the platform received 3.1 million responses. Approximately 72% of respondents voted in favour of restoring those accounts, while approximately 28% voted against it.

“The populace has spoken. The amnesty period begins next week. “Vox Populi, Vox Dei,” Musk tweeted, quoting a Latin phrase that translates as “the voice of the people is the voice of God.””

Since purchasing Twitter for $44 billion last month, Musk has continued to loosen the platform’s grip on enforcement around posts containing hate speech. Musk reactivated Donald Trump’s account last week after Twitter permanently suspended it following the Capitol insurgency, citing a “risk of further incitement of violence” at the time.

According to NBC News, European Union regulators published a report on Thursday that found Twitter removed fewer hate-speech posts than the previous year.

According to a sample analysed in the EU report, Twitter removed 45.5% of hate speech posts it was notified about, down from 49.8% in 2021 — and those numbers are worse than any other social media platform tested, including TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube.

Not only has Trump’s account been revived. Other accounts that have been reinstated since Musk’s ownership include Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, controversial influencer Andrew Tate, who has a history of spreading misogynistic and violent comments about women, and Jordan Peterson, a psychologist who had his account was suspended after tweets targeting trans people.

Prior to assuming control of the social media company, Musk chastised it for “failing to adhere to free speech principles.” He previously stated his intention to form a “content moderation council.” However, given the recent employee exodus, Musk may find it difficult to carry out any vision he has for Twitter. Thousands of employees have left the company in recent weeks after Musk issued an ultimatum to his employees, telling them to either work long hours at high intensity or quit.

You May Be Also Interested in:

Follow us for more updates on Twitter, Tumblr, LinkedIn

Apple iPhone manufacturer Foxconn apologises for a hiring blunder that resulted in violent protests

In Zhengzhou, the largest Apple iPhone factory, owned by Foxconn, is dealing with violent protests. On Wednesday, reports began to circulate that workers were smashing CCTV cameras with sticks. Workers were also seen damaging property at the factory in videos.

Foxconn has finally apologised for a “technical error” in the hiring process that resulted in the violent protests.

According to Reuters, Foxconn is investigating the matter and has discovered a technical problem in the onboarding process. “Our team has been investigating the matter and discovered a technical error occurred during the onboarding process,” Foxconn said.

Foxconn went on to say that the problem was caused by an input error in the computer system. They have promised that the pay will be the same as stated during the hiring process.

“We apologise for an input error in the computer system and guarantee that the actual pay is the same as agreed and the official recruitment posters,” the statement continued.

Foxconn went on to say that the problem was caused by an input error in the computer system. They have promised that the pay will be the same as stated during the hiring process.

According to the report, the majority of the agitators have stopped protesting. The company claims to be working with a smaller group of protesters at the manufacturing facility to resolve the issue.

Some workers also complained about the factory’s poor working conditions during the lockdown. They didn’t even know if they’d get food while they were quarantined.

Apple iPhones are manufactured in China’s Zhengzhou factory, which employs over 2 lakh people. The factory is also in charge of producing the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max models, which are not currently produced in India. The factory’s size and operations can be understood by the fact that it alone is responsible for 70% of iPhone shipments worldwide.

China’s zero-covid policy, combined with an increase in Covid cases, has resulted in more lockdowns. After the protests began, the country declared a state of emergency in the city. Residents have been asked to remain inside.

The factory is also in charge of producing the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max models, which are not currently produced in India. The factory’s size and operations can be understood by the fact that it alone is responsible for 70% of iPhone shipments worldwide.

You May Be Also Interested in:

Follow us for more updates on Twitter, Tumblr, LinkedIn

Exit mobile version